Prof. PeptideProf. Peptide
Back to Peptide Library

IGF-1 DES

Growth FactorResearch-Grade

Last reviewed: July 21, 2026

Quick Facts

What it is
DES(1-3)IGF-1 — a truncated IGF-1 analogue missing the N-terminal tripeptide, letting it evade the IGF-binding proteins that normally sequester IGF-1 and making it markedly more potent locally.
How it's taken
Subcutaneous injection (the route used in the animal literature)
Half-life
No verified human PK — free IGF peptides clear in minutes
Typical research dose
No validated human dose — only animal (~1–2 mg/kg/day rodent infusion) and cell-culture parameters exist
Research status
Preclinical only — essentially no human data. NOT the same as mecasermin/Increlex (that approved drug is full-length IGF-1). WADA-prohibited (S2).
On this page

What is IGF-1 DES?

IGF-1 DES — des(1-3)IGF-1, also called destripeptide IGF-1 — is a truncated 67-amino-acid analogue of insulin-like growth factor-1, missing the N-terminal tripeptide Gly-Pro-Glu. Deleting that tripeptide (especially the Glu3 residue) sharply lowers its affinity for IGF-binding proteins, so it escapes the sequestration that normally blunts circulating IGF-1 — making it markedly more potent than intact IGF-1 in cell and rodent studies. Crucially, that potency is an availability effect, not stronger receptor binding, and the evidence base is almost entirely preclinical: there are essentially no controlled human trials. It is a distinct compound from the approved drug mecasermin (Increlex), which is recombinant full-length IGF-1. New to peptide research? Start with the basics →

Reported benefits:

  • Escapes IGFBP sequestration, delivering more free peptide to the IGF-1 receptor (mechanistic, from cell/rodent data)
  • ~7–10x greater potency than intact IGF-1 in cell assays; ~2.5x in vivo in rats [1][4]
  • Anabolic in rodent models (increased weight gain, nitrogen retention, muscle protein synthesis) [3][4]
  • No human efficacy has been demonstrated — all reported benefits are preclinical

Common research dose: No validated human dosing protocol is established. The only quantified doses in the literature are animal (rodent subcutaneous infusion, ~1–2 mg/kg/day) and cell-culture nanomolar concentrations. Any human microgram figure circulating in community sources is not derived from published clinical evidence.

Where to buy: IGF-1 DES is a niche research-grade compound. In PP's vetted directory it is currently listed by Swiss Chems. See Verified Discount Codes → for current options.

How does IGF-1 DES work?

IGF-1 DES (des(1-3)IGF-1) is a truncated IGF-1 analogue missing the N-terminal tripeptide Gly-Pro-Glu. Removing this tripeptide — especially the Glu3 residue — sharply lowers the peptide's affinity for the IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) that normally sequester circulating IGF-1. Because it escapes IGFBP sequestration, more free peptide reaches the type-1 IGF receptor. This is an AVAILABILITY effect, not stronger receptor binding: des(1-3)IGF-1 binds the IGF-1 receptor equal to or slightly worse than intact IGF-1.

  1. N-terminal truncation [1]. IGF-1 DES lacks the first three N-terminal amino acids (Gly-Pro-Glu) of the 70-residue IGF-1 sequence, leaving a 67-amino-acid peptide. The deletion of Glu3 in particular is what disrupts high-affinity IGFBP binding.
  2. IGFBP evasion is the core mechanism [2]. IGF-binding proteins normally bind and sequester the great majority of circulating IGF-1 and IGF-2, blunting their activity. In the defining experiment, IGFBPs suppressed IGF-1 and IGF-2 activity but had essentially NO effect on des(1-3)IGF-1 — establishing that the derivative works by escaping IGFBP sequestration.
  3. Greater availability, not greater affinity [1][4]. Because more free peptide reaches the receptor, des(1-3)IGF-1 shows roughly 7–10x greater potency in cell assays and about 2.5x in vivo in rats. Yet in direct binding studies it binds the IGF-1 receptor equal to or slightly WORSE than intact IGF-1 — the potency is an availability effect, full stop.
  4. Downstream signaling is conventional. Once bound to the type-1 IGF receptor, the resulting signaling (PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways driving protein synthesis and anti-catabolic effects) is the same as for intact IGF-1. IGF-1 DES does not introduce a novel signaling route — it simply delivers more agonist to the same receptor.
  5. Shorter systemic residence [2]. Escaping IGFBP binding also removes the carrier reservoir that prolongs intact IGF-1's circulating half-life. IGFBP-evasion therefore tends to SHORTEN systemic residence relative to IGFBP-bound IGF-1 — one reason free IGF peptides are understood to clear rapidly.

What is IGF-1 DES used for?

IGF-1 DES has been characterized almost exclusively in preclinical work: cell-culture potency and receptor-binding assays, and rodent anabolism studies from the late 1980s and early 1990s. There are no controlled human efficacy or safety trials. Everything below is animal or cell data — stated plainly so it is not mistaken for evidence of human benefit.

  1. Potency and receptor-binding characterization [1]. Ballard 1987 established that des(1-3)IGF-1 was ~7x more potent than intact IGF-1 in a protein-synthesis bioassay, and that this potency was not explained by tighter IGF-1 receptor binding.
  2. The IGFBP-evasion mechanism [2]. Ross 1989 is the mechanistic key: IGFBPs suppressed IGF-1 and IGF-2 activity but not des(1-3)IGF-1, showing the derivative's potency comes from escaping IGFBP sequestration.
  3. Anabolism in diabetic rats [3]. Tomas 1991 found that both IGF-1 and des(1-3)IGF-1 increased weight gain, nitrogen retention and muscle protein synthesis in diabetic rats, with lean-tissue-directed anabolism.
  4. Anabolism in glucocorticoid-catabolic rats [4]. Tomas 1992 found the IGFBP-evading variants des(1-3)IGF-1 and LR3-IGF-1 were ~2.5x more potent than intact IGF-1 in dexamethasone-treated rats, despite weaker receptor binding.
  5. Pituitary GH/IGFBP secretion in vitro [5]. Simes 1991 showed des(1-3)IGF-1 affected GH and IGFBP secretion from cultured rat anterior pituitary cells with greater potency than intact IGF-1.
  6. Human evidence: essentially none. No controlled human efficacy or safety trials of IGF-1 DES exist. Claims of human body-composition or recovery benefit are extrapolations from rodent and cell data, not findings from human research.

How long does IGF-1 DES take to work?

There is no human timeline data for IGF-1 DES because there are no human trials. Any statement about how quickly effects appear in people would be speculation. What can be said is mechanistic and drawn from animals: free IGF peptides that escape IGFBP binding are understood to clear rapidly (minutes), so there is no carrier-driven sustained exposure.

No human onset-of-effect data exists for IGF-1 DES — no controlled trial has measured a timeline in people. In the rodent literature, anabolic effects (weight gain, nitrogen retention, muscle protein synthesis) were measured over multi-day continuous subcutaneous infusion, not from single injections, and those parameters describe animals rather than humans. Mechanistically, because des(1-3)IGF-1 escapes the IGFBP carrier system that prolongs intact IGF-1's half-life, free IGF peptides are expected to clear within minutes — there is no verified human pharmacokinetic profile to define a meaningful onset or duration.

How is IGF-1 DES dosed?

No validated human dosing protocol for IGF-1 DES exists. The only quantified doses in the published literature are animal (rodent subcutaneous mini-pump infusion, roughly 1–2 mg/kg/day in the Australian studies) and cell-culture nanomolar concentrations. Those are experimental parameters for animals and cells — not recommendations for humans. Any human 'research dose' circulating in community sources is not derived from published clinical evidence.

  1. No validated human dose. There is no established, evidence-based human dosing protocol for IGF-1 DES. This is the single most important point in this section.
  2. Animal dose (context only). The rodent anabolism studies used continuous subcutaneous mini-pump infusion at roughly 1–2 mg/kg/day [3][4]. This is an animal experimental parameter, not a human dose.
  3. Cell-culture dose (context only). In-vitro bioassays used nanomolar concentrations [1][2][5]. These describe a culture dish, not a person.
  4. Community figures are not evidence. Any specific human microgram figure circulating in forums or vendor copy is not traceable to a published clinical study and should not be treated as a validated dose.

Because no validated human dose exists, this profile does not recommend one. The reconstitution math shown in the next section is illustrative unit-conversion arithmetic only.

How is IGF-1 DES administered?

There is no established human administration protocol for IGF-1 DES. The route reported in the animal literature is subcutaneous, but timing, food-state, and steady-state parameters were never characterized for humans. The aspect table below reports only what is actually established (very little); the reconstitution table is illustrative unit-conversion math and NOT a recommended human dose.

What is and isn't known. The rodent studies delivered des(1-3)IGF-1 by continuous subcutaneous infusion, so subcutaneous is the route with any experimental precedent. Beyond that, the practical parameters people usually want — best time of day, whether to dose with food, half-life, steady-state — are simply not established for IGF-1 DES in humans. The table records that honestly rather than inventing values.

AspectStatus
RouteSubcutaneous (the route used in the animal literature)
Best time of dayNot established
FoodNot established
Half-lifeNo verified human PK (free IGF peptides clear in minutes)
Site rotationStandard
Steady-stateNot established

Reconstitution math (illustrative only). The table below is pure unit-conversion arithmetic showing how a given mass of powder maps to draws on a U-100 insulin syringe (100 units = 1 mL). It assumes a 1 mg vial. The microgram columns are illustrative reconstitution math only — NOT recommended human doses. No validated human dose for IGF-1 DES exists, so nothing in this table should be read as a dosing recommendation.

BAC waterConcentration20 mcg50 mcg100 mcg
1 mL1 mg/mL2 units5 units10 units
2 mL0.5 mg/mL4 units10 units20 units

Units vs mcg. At a 1 mg vial reconstituted in 1 mL, each U-100 unit drawn corresponds to 10 mcg of powder; at 2 mL, each unit corresponds to 5 mcg. This is conversion arithmetic for laboratory handling, not a human dosing instruction. For a primer on reading insulin syringes, see our guide on syringes and injection technique.

What does IGF-1 DES stack well with?

In community discussion IGF-1 DES is often mentioned alongside GH secretagogues and other IGF-axis peptides, on the theory that stimulating endogenous GH raises IGF-1 while a locally-acting IGF variant adds direct receptor activation. This is a rationale, not evidence: there are no controlled human studies of any IGF-1 DES stack, so no synergy claim can be substantiated. The links below are to related profiles for orientation only.

  1. IGF-1 LR3. IGF-1 LR3 is the other IGFBP-evading IGF-1 variant and the most common point of comparison. The two are alternative approaches to the same evasion goal — there is no evidence for combining them, and doing so would stack two IGF-1 receptor agonists with no human safety data.
  2. GH secretagogues. IGF-1 DES is often discussed alongside Ipamorelin, CJC-1295, and MK-677, which raise endogenous GH and IGF-1. Any combined use is community practice, not a protocol supported by controlled human data.
  3. No demonstrated synergy. No published study has tested IGF-1 DES in a human stack. Claims of additive or synergistic benefit are speculative and should be treated as such.

What are the side effects of IGF-1 DES?

The human safety profile of IGF-1 DES is unknown — there are no controlled human trials to characterize it. The concerns below are extrapolated from the biology of the IGF axis in general, not from data specific to des(1-3)IGF-1 in humans. They are theoretical risks, and their absence from a list does not mean an effect is safe.

Common (expected from the IGF axis)

  1. Hypoglycemia. IGF-1 receptor activation has insulin-like metabolic effects and can lower blood glucose. This is the most predictable acute concern for any IGF-1 agonist.
  2. Injection-site reactions. Local redness or irritation, as with any subcutaneous peptide injection.

Less common (moderate, theoretical)

  1. Tissue overgrowth. Sustained IGF-1 receptor stimulation is theoretically capable of driving unwanted tissue growth. Not characterized for des(1-3)IGF-1 in humans.
  2. Fluid retention and related IGF/GH-axis effects. Reported broadly for the IGF/GH axis; unquantified for this specific analogue.

Serious (theoretical, IGF-axis-wide)

  1. Promotion of pre-existing neoplasia. The IGF axis is well recognized in oncology as a growth-promoting pathway that can accelerate pre-existing tumors. This concern applies to the IGF axis generally; it has NOT been characterized for des(1-3)IGF-1 in humans, but it is the most serious theoretical risk.
  2. Unknown human safety overall. No controlled human trial has assessed the safety of IGF-1 DES. The full risk profile is genuinely uncharacterized.

The honest summary: IGF-1 DES has an unknown human safety profile. Every item above is inferred from IGF-axis biology rather than measured for this compound in people.

Does IGF-1 DES interact with other drugs?

No human interaction studies of IGF-1 DES exist. The one interaction that is conceptually clear-cut is with agents affecting glucose control, because IGF-1 receptor activation has insulin-like effects. Everything else is unstudied.

  1. Insulin and glucose-lowering agents. Because IGF-1 receptor activation lowers blood glucose, concurrent use with insulin or other hypoglycemic agents could theoretically compound hypoglycemia. This is a conceptual interaction, not one measured in humans for des(1-3)IGF-1.
  2. Other IGF-1 receptor agonists (e.g., IGF-1 LR3, full-length IGF-1). Combining agonists at the same receptor stacks the same theoretical risks (hypoglycemia, tissue overgrowth) with no human data to bound them.
  3. No characterized drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions. There are no published human interaction studies of any kind for IGF-1 DES.

How should IGF-1 DES be stored?

  1. Lyophilized (powder) form: Store at -20°C for long-term storage; refrigerate at 2–8°C for short-term.
  2. Reconstituted solution: Store at 2–8°C; use within 28–30 days.
  3. Reconstitute with bacteriostatic water for injection (BAC water). Swirl gently — do not shake.
  4. Never freeze reconstituted solution.
  5. Protect from light. Store in original carton.
  6. Discard if cloudy, discolored, or contains particles.

What are the limitations of IGF-1 DES research?

This is the most important section on the page. IGF-1 DES is a preclinical research compound with no human evidence base. Read the mechanism and potency claims elsewhere on this page through that lens: they come from rodents and cell dishes, not people.

No human efficacy or safety data. There are no controlled human trials of IGF-1 DES. No human study has established that it does anything beneficial, at any dose, safely. The absence is near-total, and this profile does not paper over it.

Potency claims are rodent and cell only. The headline "7–10x more potent" and "2.5x in vivo" figures come from cell bioassays and rat studies [1][4]. They describe potency in those systems, not clinical effect in humans.

Do not conflate with mecasermin (Increlex). The FDA-approved drug mecasermin is recombinant full-length IGF-1. IGF-1 DES is the des(1-3) truncation and is a distinct, unapproved compound. Approval of mecasermin says nothing about the safety or efficacy of IGF-1 DES.

Vendor identity and purity are unverified. Research-grade IGF-1 DES is sold without regulatory oversight of identity or purity; what is in a given vial cannot be assumed to match the label without independent testing.

Prohibited in sport. The World Anti-Doping Agency prohibits IGF-1 and its analogues at all times under Section S2. IGF-1 DES is a research chemical, not approved for human consumption.

Where to source IGF-1 DES

IGF-1 DES is not FDA-approved for any human use and is sold only as a research-grade peptide. It is a niche compound with limited vendor coverage. In PP's vetted directory it is currently listed by the vendor highlighted below, which publishes batch certificates of analysis.

Lists IGF-1 DES · published batch COAs · code PROF10

Click to copy code

Shop Swiss Chems

See all 26 verified vendors →

IGF-1 DES FAQ

Is IGF-1 DES the same as mecasermin (Increlex)?

No — and conflating the two is the most common error. Mecasermin (Increlex) is FDA-approved recombinant full-length IGF-1. IGF-1 DES is the des(1-3) truncation — a 67-amino-acid variant missing the N-terminal tripeptide (Gly-Pro-Glu). The approval that applies to mecasermin does not extend to IGF-1 DES, which has no approved human use.

Is there any human data on IGF-1 DES?

Essentially none. There are no controlled human efficacy or safety trials of des(1-3)IGF-1. The entire evidence base is preclinical — cell-culture bioassays and rodent studies from the late 1980s and early 1990s. Any human 'protocol' circulating in community sources is not derived from published clinical evidence.

Why is des(1-3)IGF-1 more potent than intact IGF-1?

Availability, not receptor affinity. Removing the N-terminal tripeptide (especially Glu3) sharply lowers binding to the IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) that normally sequester circulating IGF-1. Because des(1-3)IGF-1 escapes that sequestration, more free peptide reaches the type-1 IGF receptor — producing roughly 7–10x greater potency in cell assays and about 2.5x in vivo in rats [1][2][4]. Notably, des(1-3)IGF-1 binds the IGF-1 receptor equal to or slightly worse than intact IGF-1; the potency comes from escaping IGFBPs, not from tighter receptor binding.

How is IGF-1 DES different from IGF-1 LR3?

Both are IGFBP-evading IGF-1 variants, which is why they are often discussed together. IGF-1 DES achieves evasion by deleting the N-terminal tripeptide; IGF-1 LR3 achieves it by adding a 13-residue N-terminal extension plus an Arg-for-Glu3 substitution. A frequently repeated distinction is that IGF-1 DES tends to have a shorter systemic residence — escaping IGFBP binding removes the carrier reservoir that prolongs intact IGF-1's half-life. Neither claim has been validated in controlled human pharmacokinetic studies.

What is the correct dose of IGF-1 DES?

There is no validated human dosing protocol. The only quantified doses in the literature are animal (rodent subcutaneous mini-pump infusion, roughly 1–2 mg/kg/day in the Australian studies) and cell-culture nanomolar concentrations. Those are experimental parameters for animals and cells — not human doses. No published clinical evidence establishes a safe or effective human dose.

Is IGF-1 DES banned in sport?

Yes. IGF-1 and its analogues are prohibited at all times by the World Anti-Doping Agency under Section S2 (peptide hormones, growth factors, related substances). IGF-1 DES falls squarely within the IGF-1 analogue class.

Where can I buy IGF-1 DES?

IGF-1 DES is sold only as a research-grade material. In PP's vetted vendor directory it is currently listed by Swiss Chems — see the Verified Discount Codes → page for current options.

References

  1. Ballard FJ, Francis GL, Ross M, Bagley CJ, May B, Wallace JC. Natural and synthetic forms of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and the potent derivative, destripeptide IGF-1: biological activities and receptor binding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987;149(2):398-404. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2962574/
  2. Ross M, Francis GL, Szabo L, Wallace JC, Ballard FJ. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins inhibit the biological activities of IGF-1 and IGF-2 but not des-(1-3)-IGF-1. Biochem J. 1989;258(1):267-272. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2539101/
  3. Tomas FM, Knowles SE, Owens PC, et al. Increased weight gain, nitrogen retention and muscle protein synthesis following treatment of diabetic rats with insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and des(1-3)IGF-I. Biochem J. 1991;276(Pt 2):547-554. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1710892/
  4. Tomas FM, Knowles SE, Owens PC, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and especially IGF-I variants are anabolic in dexamethasone-treated rats. Biochem J. 1992;282(Pt 1):91-97. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1371669/
  5. Simes JM, Wallace JC, Walton PE. The effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF-II and des(1-3)IGF-I, a potent IGF analogue, on growth hormone and IGF-binding protein secretion from cultured rat anterior pituitary cells. J Endocrinol. 1991;130(1):93-99. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1715381/

Published Studies

Plain-English summaries of the peer-reviewed studies behind the claims above. Every one is preclinical (cell or rodent) — there are no human trials of IGF-1 DES. Click any title to read the source paper.

Biochem Biophys Res Commun / PubMed · 1987Abstract open
Natural and synthetic forms of IGF-1 and the potent derivative destripeptide IGF-1: biological activities and receptor binding

Ballard FJ, Francis GL, Ross M, Bagley CJ, May B, Wallace JC.

Foundational characterization of destripeptide IGF-1. In a protein-synthesis bioassay, des(1-3)IGF-1 was roughly 7x more potent than intact IGF-1 — and, critically, this potency was NOT explained by tighter IGF-1 receptor binding. The study set up the central puzzle later resolved by the IGFBP-evasion mechanism.

Biochem J / PubMed · 1989Open Access
IGF-binding proteins inhibit the biological activities of IGF-1 and IGF-2 but not des-(1-3)-IGF-1

Ross M, Francis GL, Szabo L, Wallace JC, Ballard FJ.

The mechanistic key. IGF-binding proteins strongly suppressed the biological activity of IGF-1 and IGF-2 but had essentially no effect on des-(1-3)-IGF-1. This established that the derivative's greater potency comes from escaping IGFBP sequestration rather than from any change in receptor pharmacology.

Biochem J / PubMed · 1991Open Access
Increased weight gain, nitrogen retention and muscle protein synthesis following treatment of diabetic rats with IGF-1 and des(1-3)IGF-1

Tomas FM, Knowles SE, Owens PC, et al.

In diabetic rats, both IGF-1 and des(1-3)IGF-1 increased weight gain, nitrogen retention and muscle protein synthesis, with anabolism directed toward lean tissue. An animal model — not a human efficacy trial.

Biochem J / PubMed · 1992Open Access
IGF-1 and especially IGF-1 variants are anabolic in dexamethasone-treated rats

Tomas FM, Knowles SE, Owens PC, et al.

In a glucocorticoid-catabolic rat model, the IGFBP-evading variants des(1-3)IGF-1 and LR3-IGF-1 were roughly 2.5x more potent than intact IGF-1 despite weaker IGF-1 receptor binding — reinforcing that reduced IGFBP binding, not receptor affinity, drives in-vivo potency.

J Endocrinol / PubMed · 1991Abstract open
Effects of IGF-1, IGF-2 and des(1-3)IGF-1 on growth hormone and IGF-binding protein secretion from cultured rat anterior pituitary cells

Simes JM, Wallace JC, Walton PE.

In rat anterior pituitary cell culture, des(1-3)IGF-1 affected GH and IGFBP secretion with greater potency than intact IGF-1 — again attributed to reduced local IGFBP sequestration rather than a distinct receptor mechanism.

Growth FactorIGF-1 AnalogueIGFBP EvasionResearch-Grade

Need to calculate a dose?

Use the Prof. Peptide dosage calculator for accurate reconstitution and dosing math.

Open Calculator

We may earn commissions from peptide vendor affiliate links.

Have a question about IGF-1 DES? Send us an email →

For educational and research purposes only. Not medical advice. Not for human use.